Opening post
Be interesting to see any changes between the squads.
Member actions
ShareSeries
Series/Tournament
Opening post
Member actions
ShareMember actions
ShareMember actions
ShareQuoted from Andy31 in post #47209
I just saw the replay of Clive's catch, that's one of the best i have seen.
Member actions
ShareQuoted from aydee in post #47210
Quoted from Andy31 in post #47209
I just saw the replay of Clive's catch, that's one of the best i have seen.
Incredible, wasn't it!
Member actions
ShareMember actions
ShareQuoted from Andy31 in post #47212
A few interesting things from the Rainsford press conference.
All teams had to play their African associate player in 4 of the 7 games.
The aim is for the clubs to essentially run on their own without too much ZC financial support. So essentially clubs should be bringing in their own sponsors etc.
Most clubs have been receiving grants for the last few years.
Member actions
ShareQuoted from dandy in post #47213
Quoted from Andy31 in post #47212
A few interesting things from the Rainsford press conference.
All teams had to play their African associate player in 4 of the 7 games.
The aim is for the clubs to essentially run on their own without too much ZC financial support. So essentially clubs should be bringing in their own sponsors etc.
Most clubs have been receiving grants for the last few years.
Whats the point then? Its a ZC tournament, ZC should be funding them. Better to do this, than build the Victoria Falls stadium
Member actions
ShareQuoted from Andy31 in post #47214
So the thinking is that the tournament will be more ZC but clubs we’ll be less financially reliable on ZC for other aspects of running.
Member actions
ShareMember actions
ShareQuoted from admin in post #47216
ZC can finance a cricket competition. It cannot manufacture a self-sustaining club culture through press releases.
Club Memberships and Culture
Before the purge of the mid-2000s, Zimbabwe had a thriving network of cricket clubs, predominantly run and financed by white communities. From Hwange to Mutare to Bindura, there were clubs with well-maintained grounds, functioning facilities and established memberships.
Members paid their subscriptions, volunteered their time and took responsibility for maintaining their institutions. This was a deeply ingrained culture that had developed over generations.
Then came the farm seizures and the subsequent destruction of much of the commercial farming sector. Many of the people financing these institutions lost their livelihoods, while others left the country altogether.
Fast forward two decades and look at the state of cricket grounds around the country.
We didn't just lose farmers and cricketers. We lost decades of institutional knowledge, financial support and cricket culture.
An uncomfortable truth that most refuse to acknowledge is:
The culture of paying subscriptions and collectively financing community sporting institutions simply hasn't taken root among black Zimbabweans on anything approaching the same scale.
Let me be clear, skin colour has nothing to do with it. Culture does.
I see this cultural difference everywhere. There are still plenty of well-run, community-funded sporting establishments with roots in Zimbabwe's white communities.
And before someone blames everything on poverty, Zimbabwe now has plenty of wealthy black people. What we don't seem to have is a comparable culture of collectively financing and maintaining sporting institutions.
Having money and having a culture of contributing towards community projects are two very different things.
Consider Gladiators Cricket Club.
How many people in Glen View would willingly contribute US$5 every month towards maintaining the club?
How many would sacrifice an entire Saturday to watch Gladiators play cricket?
The average bloke in Glen View has enough financial headaches without adding the maintenance of a cricket pitch to his monthly obligations.
Cricket simply doesn't have that kind of community following.
Corruption and Accountability
Then there's Zimbabwe's other national pastime. Corruption.
Even where people are willing to contribute financially, there's the small matter of ensuring that their money doesn't disappear into somebody's pocket.
We live in a country where incompetence and corruption are frequently rewarded, provided the perpetrators have the right political connections.
Why would anybody willingly contribute to a club whose administrators aren't accountable to its members?
You cannot develop a culture of financial participation without also developing a culture of transparency and accountability.
And Zimbabwe isn't exactly a world leader in either department.
Corporate Sponsorships
Corporate sponsorship is probably the most realistic option.
The corporate world already contributes significantly towards Zimbabwean cricket, but I wonder how much more it can realistically provide.
What commercial value does a company derive from sponsoring a cricket club whose matches attract crowds consisting of the players' relatives, a handful of enthusiasts and the occasional stray dog?
Where Is the Business Model?
I'm not suggesting that clubs should become completely independent of ZC. But if the objective is to reduce their financial dependence, where exactly is the alternative revenue going to come from?
How many paying members do these clubs currently have? What do their annual operating expenses look like? Do they own facilities capable of generating income? What percentage of their budgets does ZC currently finance?
And most importantly, what are the club administrators doing to develop reliable sources of recurring income?
You cannot simply create cricket teams, enter them into a national competition and expect financially sustainable sporting institutions to materialise.
My biggest concern is that we're trying to recreate the sporting structures of the past without recreating the culture that made those structures possible.
Zimbabwe has a serious problem with maintaining institutions, infrastructure and standards. Cricket is merely a microcosm of that wider cultural problem.
Unless we develop a culture of collective ownership, financial participation and institutional accountability, these clubs will remain dependent on ZC or corporate sponsors.
I genuinely hope I'm wrong.
But I'd love to know how the administrators intend to make this work over the long term.
Member actions
ShareQuoted from admin in post #47174
Quoted from Pat_Bee in post #47173
Googly is this admin guy 😂😂 the tell tale signs are there
😂😂😂 oh Pat, or should I say Zolsky, what are you on about? I have a moment to kill, so I'll take the bait.
Firstly, I know how to spell the word enough correctly. If that's not enuf (👈 Googly tell) evidence, there is more 👇
Another easy tell, I don't butcher Shona or Ndebele names as he sometimes did. Not that it's a crime. Both languages are difficult grasp for non-native speakers. I'm a Shona guy. I believe Googly is English speaking.
Googly knows way more about the game than I do. He also knows people in Zim cricket circles that I don't. He always came here with first hand info that I quite simply don't have access to.
Finally, I don't rant as much as he used to. Ok, maybe I dish out a longie here and there, but not as much as Googly 😂
I could give you a breakdown of how our writing styles are different, but that will chew up my time. I believe the evidence presented herein is sufficient to invalidate your claim Pat. Case closed!
Back on topic, you must be disappointed that your boys lost to SOGO hey Zolsky? I remember you picking on Matthew Campbell for no reason. Has your opinion on him changed now? 😂
Member actions
ShareMember actions
ShareMember actions
ShareMember actions
ShareEdited
Member actions
ShareMember actions
ShareMember actions
ShareQuoted from Pat_Bee in post #47396
Yeah there is, all franchises will have B squads. Old hamilton masakadza said this weeks ago 😂
Member actions
Share